Kinematics

Kinematics

Measuring the acceleration of free fall, g

Equations of motion AS Level 18 min read

On this page
  1. What you need to be able to do
  2. The experiment: drop a ball and time it
  3. Errors and how to spot them
  4. Try it: find g from a graph
  5. Describing the experiment for marks
  6. Mark-scheme focus
  7. Worked examples
  8. Summary
  9. Can I do this?
  10. Quiz

What you need to be able to do

Syllabus 2.1
  • 2.1.8Describe an experiment to determine the acceleration of free fall using a falling object.

Before you start: Equations of motion (s = ut + ½at²) and Errors and uncertainties. This page covers the experiment the way Papers 1 and 2 ask about it. Next: Projectiles.

The experiment: drop a ball and time it

electromagnet steel ball trapdoor h 0.452 selectronic timer switch: release + startball hits: stop
Opening the switch releases the ball and starts the timer; the ball hitting the trapdoor stops it.
  1. Set up: an electromagnet holds a small steel ball above a trapdoor. Opening a switch releases the ball and starts an electronic timer; the ball hitting the trapdoor stops it. So the ball starts from rest (u = 0) and the time t is measured without reaction time.
  2. Measure the height h the ball actually falls: from the bottom of the ball to the trapdoor, with a metre rule (use a set square to read it level).
  3. Measure the time t. Repeat 3 times for this height and take the mean.
  4. Change the height and repeat, for at least 5 heights over as large a range as possible (e.g. 0.20 m to 1.00 m).
  5. Plot h against t² and draw the line of best fit. Since \(h = \tfrac12 g t^2\), the line is straight and g = 2 × gradient.

One drop

\[ g = \frac{2h}{t^2} \]

From \(h = ut + \tfrac12gt^2\) with u = 0 (9702/13/O/N/14 Q6: answer D).

Graph of h against t²

\[ h = \left(\tfrac12 g\right) t^2 \;\Rightarrow\; g = 2 \times \text{gradient} \]

A straight line through the origin (9702/13/M/J/21 Q7: a = 2G).

Uncertainty in g

\[ \%g = \%h + 2 \times \%t \]

The time is squared, so its % counts twice. Mass is not needed at all.

Light gates are the other common timer: two gates a measured distance apart, or a card of known length falling through one gate. The ball is already moving at the first gate, so u is not zero there: use \(s = ut + \tfrac12gt^2\) with both terms 9702/11/O/N/15 Q7.

Errors and how to spot them

ErrorTypeEffect on gHow to deal with it
h measured from the electromagnet (top of the ball), not the bottom of the ballsystematich too big → g too bigsubtract the diameter, or plot a graph: the intercept shows it 9702/11/O/N/23 Q3, 9702/23/O/N/10 Q4
timer starts before the ball lets go (the magnet takes time to release it)systematict too big → g too smallgraph: the points shift to the right and the line misses the origin; start the timer with the release (same switch)
air resistancesystematicthe ball accelerates less than g → g too smalluse a small, dense ball and short drops
scatter in the timer readings, reading hrandomvalues spread either siderepeat and average; use bigger heights so % uncertainties are smaller
Which way does g move? From \(g = 2h/t^2\): h measured too large → g too large; t measured too small → g too large; t measured too large → g too small 9702/13/M/J/12 Q7, 9702/12/M/J/15 Q7.

Try it: find g from a graph

Drop, time, plot

Teaching point: plotting d against t² gives a straight line with gradient g/2. A systematic error in d moves the line off the origin but leaves the gradient the same, so the graph still gives g.

t² / s²d / m gradient = g/2 ≈ 4.9 m s⁻²
Five heights, 0.20 m to 1.00 m: gradient 4.9 m s⁻², so g = 9.8 m s⁻².

Turn on JavaScript to drop the ball yourself and add systematic errors.

Describing the experiment for marks

Past-paper style5 marks

Describe an experiment to determine the acceleration of free fall g using a falling object. Include the measurements you would take and how you would use them to find g.

• Steel ball held by an electromagnet; switching it off releases the ball from rest and starts an electronic timer; the ball hits a trapdoor which stops the timer.

• Measure the height h fallen (bottom of the ball to the trapdoor) with a metre rule, and the time t on the timer.

• Repeat for the same h and average t; repeat for several different h.

• Plot h against t²; the gradient is g/2, so g = 2 × gradient (or g = 2h/t² for each height).

• A small dense ball keeps air resistance negligible.

This model answer is written in past-paper style: recent Paper 2s ask about the experiment through data and graphs (as in the examples below) rather than for a full description, but the syllabus says "describe", so be ready for it.

Mark-scheme focus

Why the graph has a non-zero intercept

9702/23/O/N/10 Q4Paper 2 · AS structured questionsPart (b)2 marksFull size
The student measures the vertical distance d between the base of the electromagnet and the bench, and the time t for the iron ball to fall. (b) State and explain why there is a non-zero intercept on the graph of d against t^2.
Credited
  • "the distance fallen is not d" C1
  • "d is the distance fallen plus the diameter of the ball" A1
  • "d is not measured to the bottom of the ball" scores both marks
Won't score (they don't explain an intercept)
  • "reaction time" (an electronic timer has none)
  • "air resistance" (that changes the gradient, not the intercept)
  • "random error"
Why

An intercept means every reading of d is off by the same amount: a systematic error. The ball falls only from its bottom edge to the bench, which is d minus one diameter.

Bonus

The intercept on the d axis is the size of that error: here the diameter, about 1.5 cm (the scheme allowed 1.5 ± 0.5 cm).

From: 9702/23/O/N/10 Q4(b) and (c)(i) mark scheme.

  • Paper 1: g from a graph (gradient × 2), percentage uncertainty in g (%h + 2%t), which error makes g too large, which measurement is not needed (mass).
  • Paper 2: read the gradient and intercept of an h–t² graph, explain the intercept, describe the method.

Worked examples

Example 1 · Gradient, intercept and g from a real graph (Paper 2, 7 marks) ★★★ Hard
9702/23/O/N/10 Q4Paper 2 · AS structured questions7 marksFull size
A student measures the distance d between the base of an electromagnet and the bench, and the time t for an iron ball to fall. Points (t^2, d): (0.039, 20), (0.060, 30), (0.081, 40), (0.102, 50), (0.123, 60) with d in cm. (a) Draw the line of best fit. [1] (b) State and explain why there is a non-zero intercept. [2] (c) Determine (i) the diameter of the ball [1] (ii) the acceleration of free fall. [3]
1 Read it with me what is actually happening?

A student drops an iron ball from an electromagnet and times the fall for several heights d. Plotting d against t² gives a straight line that does NOT pass through the origin. We explain why, read the ball's size off the graph, and get g from the gradient.

  • line of best fita ruled straight line through the trend, extended to the axis
  • non-zero interceptd is not exactly the distance fallen - something is added every time
  • diameter of the ballthat 'something': read it as the intercept
  • acceleration of free fallcompare d = ½gt² + c with y = mx + c: gradient = g/2
2 What is it asking for? the target, part by part
  • (b)why the intercept isn't zerowords · 2 marks
  • (c)(i)the ball's diametercm · 1 mark
  • (c)(ii)gm s−2 · 3 marks
3 What do we know? pull every number out, in SI units
  • (0.039, 20) … (0.123, 60)t² in s², d in cm
  • from restu = 0
  • d is measured from the electromagnet (ball's TOP) - the ball's bottom only falls d minus its diameter
4 Plan the route work backwards from what we want
FindPhysics ideaAlready have itWork out firstTrap
  • (c)(i) Finddiameter
    • Useintercept on the d axis (t² = 0)
  • (c)(ii) Findg
    • Usegradient = g/2 → g = 2 × gradient
      • Gradienttwo far-apart points ON the line
      • Trapnot from the origin; cm → m
Write the motion as an equation. What does it look like next to y = mx + c?

d = ½g t² + (diameter). y = d, x = t², m = ½g, c = diameter.

Why must we not use (0, 0) to find the gradient?

The line doesn't go through the origin. Using it would give the wrong slope.

5 Now solve it have a go on paper first, then open the worked solution
  1. (a) The points lie on a straight line: draw it with a ruler, touching every point, and extend it to the d axis. B1
  2. (b) The distance fallen is not d C1: d is the distance fallen plus the diameter of the ball A1
  3. (c)(i) Read the intercept on the d axis: about 1.5 cm = the diameter A1 Allowed 1.5 ± 0.5 cm. No error carried forward from (a).
  4. (c)(ii) Gradient from points far apart, not using the origin: \(\dfrac{60 - 20}{0.123 - 0.039} = 476\) cm s−2 = 4.76 m s−2 C1
  5. Gradient = g/2 C1, so g = 2 × 4.76 = 9.5 m s−2 A1

The scheme wants "evidence that the origin has not been used" for the gradient: the line does not go through (0, 0), so a gradient from the origin would be wrong.

6 Check it does the answer make sense?

g = 9.5 m s−2 is close to 9.81 - a reasonable experimental value. A 1.5 cm iron ball is a sensible size.

Example 2 · Gradient of h against t² (Paper 1, 1 mark) ★★ Medium
9702/13/M/J/21 Q7Paper 1 · Multiple choice1 markFull size
A steel ball is dropped from rest from height h; it hits the ground after time t. Repeated for different heights. Graph of h against t^2 has gradient G. Which expression gives the acceleration? A G/2 B G C 2G D G^2
1 Read it with me what is actually happening?

A ball is dropped from different heights and timed. A graph of h against t² is a straight line with gradient G. How do we get the acceleration from G?

  • dropped from restu = 0, so h = ½at²
  • h against t²h is y, t² is x: match with y = mx
2 What is it asking for? the target, part by part
  • acceleration in terms of GMCQ · 1 mark
3 What do we know? pull every number out, in SI units
  • gradient = Gof h vs t²
4 Plan the route work backwards from what we want
FindPhysics ideaAlready have itWork out firstTrap
  • Finda
    • Useh = ½a t² ↔ y = m x
      • SoG = ½a → a = 2G
In h = ½at², which part plays the role of m in y = mx?

Everything multiplying t²: ½a. So the gradient G equals ½a.

Why does plotting against t² (not t) help?

h is proportional to t², so h-t² is a straight line; h-t would be a curve.

5 Now solve it have a go on paper first, then open the worked solution
  1. From rest: \(h = \tfrac12 a t^2\).
  2. Compare with y = mx: plotting h (y) against t² (x), the gradient is G = ½a.
  3. So a = 2G → C 1

The June 2021 report: many candidates found this difficult. Write the equation in the form y = mx first and match the parts.

6 Check it does the answer make sense?

For a free fall a ≈ 9.81, so G should come out about 4.9 m s−2 - half of g, consistent with a = 2G.

Example 3 · Which error, which fix? (Paper 1, 1 mark) ★★ Medium
9702/11/O/N/23 Q3Paper 1 · Multiple choice1 markFull size
A metal ball is released from an electromagnet at P, starting a timer; the timer stops when it hits a trapdoor at Q. The student measures PQ. Which statement about errors is correct? A random error reduced by adding the diameter to PQ B random error reduced by subtracting the diameter from PQ C systematic error reduced by adding the diameter to PQ D systematic error reduced by subtracting the diameter from PQ
1 Read it with me what is actually happening?

The timer starts when the ball leaves the electromagnet at P and stops when it hits the trapdoor at Q. The student measures PQ. We have to say what kind of error this set-up has, and how to correct it.

  • random errorscatter that changes from reading to reading - reduced by repeating
  • systematic errorthe same offset every time - corrected by adding or subtracting a fixed amount
  • adding / subtracting the diameterthink: does the ball actually fall MORE or LESS than PQ?
2 What is it asking for? the target, part by part
  • the correct statementMCQ · 1 mark
3 What do we know? pull every number out, in SI units
  • PQelectromagnet to trapdoor
  • ball diameterfixed
  • the ball hangs BELOW P: its bottom edge only has PQ − diameter to fall
4 Plan the route work backwards from what we want
FindPhysics ideaAlready have itWork out firstTrap
  • Decidetype of error + fix
    • Step 1same mistake every drop → systematic
    • Step 2true fall distance is smaller → subtract the diameter
Does this mistake change from one drop to the next?

No - the ball's size is the same every time, so the error is always the same: systematic.

How far does the bottom of the ball actually fall before it hits the trapdoor?

PQ minus one diameter, because the ball hangs below P.

5 Now solve it have a go on paper first, then open the worked solution
  1. PQ runs from the electromagnet (the top of the ball) to the trapdoor. The ball's bottom edge only falls PQ − one diameter.
  2. That mistake is the same for every drop: a systematic error (A and B are out: you can't fix random error by adding or subtracting a fixed amount).
  3. The true distance is smaller, so subtract the diameter → D 1
6 Check it does the answer make sense?

A fixed amount can only correct a systematic error (A and B are out). The distance must get smaller, so D.

Example 4 · Percentage uncertainty in g (Paper 1, 1 mark) ★★ Medium
9702/12/O/N/20 Q5Paper 1 · Multiple choice1 markFull size
A steel ball falls through a height h timed with light gates. h = (4.05 ± 0.01) m, t = (0.91 ± 0.02) s. g is calculated from h = 1/2 g t^2. What is the percentage uncertainty in g? A 2.4% B 4.6% C 5.1% D 9.3%
1 Read it with me what is actually happening?

g is worked out from h = ½gt², with h and t each measured with an uncertainty. We combine the uncertainties to get g's.

  • percentage uncertaintyabsolute uncertainty ÷ value × 100
  • h = ½gt²rearrange first: g = 2h ÷ t²
  • t²a power of 2 doubles t's percentage uncertainty
2 What is it asking for? the target, part by part
  • % uncertainty in g% · MCQ
3 What do we know? pull every number out, in SI units
  • h = 4.05 ± 0.01 m
  • t = 0.91 ± 0.02 s
4 Plan the route work backwards from what we want
FindPhysics ideaAlready have itWork out firstTrap
  • Find%g
    • Useg = 2h/t² → %g = %h + 2 × %t
      • %h0.01 ÷ 4.05 × 100
      • %t0.02 ÷ 0.91 × 100
      • Trapthe exact 2 has no uncertainty; the power of t doubles %t
Does the '2' in g = 2h/t² add any uncertainty?

No - it is an exact number. Only measured quantities carry uncertainty.

Why multiply %t by 2?

t is squared. t² = t × t, so its percentage uncertainty is %t + %t.

5 Now solve it have a go on paper first, then open the worked solution
  1. Rearrange: \(g = \dfrac{2h}{t^2}\), so \(\%g = \%h + 2\,\%t\) (the 2 in front is exact).
  2. \(\%h = \dfrac{0.01}{4.05} \times 100 = 0.25\%\); \(\%t = \dfrac{0.02}{0.91} \times 100 = 2.2\%\)
  3. \(\%g = 0.25 + 2 \times 2.2 = 4.6\%\) → B 1

A (2.4%) forgets that t is squared. See Case by case for every type of uncertainty question.

6 Check it does the answer make sense?

The timing dominates (4.4% of the 4.6%): t is short and its uncertainty is relatively large, so improving the timing would help most.

Summary

  • Release from rest (electromagnet), time electronically (no reaction time), measure h from the bottom of the ball.
  • Several heights, repeats averaged; plot h against t²; g = 2 × gradient.
  • A non-zero intercept = a systematic error in every reading; the gradient still gives g.
  • %g = %h + 2%t. Mass is not needed.

Can I do this?

Anything unticked: revise that section first. All ticked: take the quiz.

Quiz

Your progress on this note is saved when JavaScript is on.